Most of the blogging guides you read will tell you to find a niche that you love, a topic that you can be passionate about. You can obviously just blog about how awesome your typing skill is or what you ate for dinner, but traffic would be terrible. Statistics suggest there are certain topics rich in traffic and potential customers who will click your ads. That’s where the Reblogger shines.

The Reblogger wastes no time with low traffic topics, but goes straight to whatever is hot. Google Keyword Suggestions will tell you what people are searching for, and Microsoft Search Funnels will tell you about the keyword patterns. Actually knowing about the topic is not an issue, because writing for the general public means not having to write in too much detail anyways. You do not have to be an expert on the subject to blog about it, you just have to reword it well.

There are many sub-types of Rebloggers. If you’re a Quick Search Reblogger, your day will consist of finding out what people in your niche are searching for. You will then come up with a pre-filtered list of results that you create for your readers. If you are adept at finding those hard to reach sources of information, then you may find this style suitable for you. Alternate sources of information may come from Newsgroups, low profile professional sites, or even the 138th page of Google search results. Even opening up a real book will reveal “new” information that has a relatively low regurgitated level. Take all that info, repackage it into a list. Done.

Then there are the News Rebloggers. People read news, and a lot of it. So why not just rip a large quote off your favorite news site, add a dash of your own comment, then post it up? Preferably completely out of context of course, to generate better comment numbers.

Even better are the Gossip Rebloggers. The sleazier you can write, the more people will come back. What is more interesting than someone else’s love life after all? You may not buy one of those sleazy tabloids from the supermarket check out, but reading it on the internet is a completely different thing. After all, if CNN headlines Britney Spears before a war, there must be a good and legitimate reason for it. Conscience saved.

I understand that information has to be expressed in different ways, so that it can be absorbed better by the various personalities. Different people will learn best in different ways. Some people need a list, some a dissected explanation and some will need a fantastic promise.

If we are not counting all the variations and spinoffs on the original ideas, do we even have 1% of people attempting to generate new ideas then?